We’ve had some crazy ups and downs living an agrarian life, but now we’re going back to leafy, 75-97% white suburbia. Yes, the rest is “mixed race” and “Asian”, depending on the suburb.
The full transition (sale, buy, move) probably won’t happen until the next calendar year, but it means a chance to keep everyone healthy (because buh-bye rural commute and rural mom commute, both completely health decimating), leisure time for the parents and unstructured play time for the kids, and just more opportunities for organic social life because it’ll be a lot more people even though we still get to have “acreage”.
We both had a view of rural life that was covered in nostalgia and we’re a lot more clear eyed now. So another journey in our life together begins.
This is the universe, as the Census Bureau likes to say, of all married couples, so these numbers include married people with no kids at home or no kids at all. So this represents about 57 million families.
- ~20%, or over 11 million families, had household incomes of 100-149k in 2015
- 9%, or about 5 million families, had household incomes of 150k-200k in 2015
- ~10%, or slightly under 6 million families had household incomes of 200k or more 2015
- Less than 15%, about 8 million families, had household incomes of 35k or less in 2015
- ~35%, or about 20 million families had household incomes of 50k-99k in 2015 with around 55%, or 11 million families, being 50-74k earners
- ~11%, or around 6 million families, had household incomes of 35-49k
As you can see, nearly 40% of married couples, representing between 21 and 22 million families, have household incomes above 100k, over 1/3, or about 20 million families have household incomes of 50-100k, and around 1/4 or just 14 million families make 50k or less.
And of that number, 2/3 are in households earning 100k/yr or more. Those numbers have been pretty stable over the last decade.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2016 Annual Social and Economic Supplement
We have a woman here whose life is so easy and uncomplicated, but yet whose faith is so brittle that *loading a dishwasher* is untenable without a saint’s image to pray to. O-kay!
The evil here is that a woman in the life religious is not the same as a mother of young, closely spaced children. Such a mother ostentatiously and vaingloriously holding herself out as equivalent to a cloistered nun (who, incidentally had a pretty interesting and short life, but one that didn’t feature much in the way of dishwashing or linen folding) is morally and spiritually dangerous. In the life religious, the twenty or thirty tasks that make up a baseline of homemaking are split among many women rather than just one. And this is partly so that the beauty of the small things in domestic upkeep for a group can be understood and comprehended more completely.
Birthing human small things with souls and hearts and chasing them around and then feeling aggrieved about loading a dishwasher is not a sign of spiritual discontent. It’s simple and normal and human. But as usual, the bar is set at “housewives, if you’re not performing at the level of VIRGIN SAINTS YOU NEED TO STEP IT UP LIKE MEEEEEEEEE”.
This is far more of a problem than the Lori Alexanders of the world.
I recently finished the D’Artagnan Romances. which consist of The Three (Scandalous) Musketeers, Twenty Years After and Vicomte De Bragelonne. The last one is around 2000 pages and usually split up into three books called Vicomte De Bragelonne, Louise de la Valliere and The Man in the Iron Mask. The evolution of the Musketeers from rascally 20somethings to middle-aged men to men just waiting to retire and/or die is quite fascinating. And there is lots of drama and intrigue and action. And something like 3500 pages total.
I am currently beginning the very long journey that is reading the unabridged (and also steam coming off the 1200+ pages “mature”) Count of Monte Cristo.
I also read some Dorothy Sayers, a couple of memoirs by a 1940s housewife and Winnie the Pooh. I read all of Narnia, and The Last Unicorn, which is truly magical.
I’m still working on Maria Montessori’s pedagogy.
I have also been reading some demographic analysis stuff, apparently looking into the increase in college education among women and how it was changing their family having patterns was all the rage and then it suddenly wasn’t, around the time they became a majority of all births (the 80s).
And I haven’t done more than glance at it yet, but I have a very interesting book about sorcery, the occult and Christianity and how the neo-pagans of the late 19th century were not creating something new and weird, but echoing long standing occult practices that had been aggressively hidden by Victorians wishing to represent an unbroken line of faithful and untainted Christian practice. It’s actually about how much of this was carried over the sea by those English and Germans who “founded the country”, but it gets into backstory about the occult in Western Europe up until the 19th century.
I thought I hadn’t been reading much this year, but I haven’t even covered a quarter of what I’ve gotten through and I started on a couple other books. I guess the Dumas being soooooo long makes it seem like I’ve barely read more than two books in six months, but it’s nowhere near that bad.
This is where someone looks around at everyone behaving a certain way or doing certain things and decides that they’re two of lazy, stupid or evil.
Common examples are the way liberals tend to assume this of any conservative policy or the way that conservatives tend to assume this of SAHMs with dirty houses and/or kids.
There’s not really a political divide here, it’s common across the political spectrum. It’s just a recurring tendency that people slip into.
I guess you could also call it Chesterton’s busted fence.
See British Isles, Scandinavia, Germany. Hajnal climate lines stuff. Precipitation and temperature links.
This is a supposition, the above are bits of research that would need to happen to prove it.