Sustainable farming is all about the horrible exploitation of Mexican single mothers and slightly smarter brown women creating one middle-income job with benefits for themselves along the way as administrators of various “incubators” for small-scale vegetable farming.
What does it have to do with conservatives? They could Notice that the stable farms producing local or regional food are not part of some baksheesh scam, but in fact are family enterprises that return profits and are mostly farmed by intact Christian families. They could also point out that the “diversity” push is actively removing farmland from production and leading to less food produced over time, rather than more. In the examples above, most of the land isn’t being farmed and what is being farmed is plots barely larger than a backyard garden. The women farming those plots are worse off than actual sharecropping, because they’re never given enough land to make a full time income from, but they’re also not allowed to farm the entire plot as a group for the “incubator”. It is the worst of independent “farming” of a backyard plot combined with all the regulatory hassles of having many masters as in a full-on collective.
There’s also fun stuff like requiring the immigrant single mothers to take college courses (that they have to pay for) to maintain access to the plots they do farm.
This is so horrifying I’m just going to put it up as it is and not try to expand on the numerous other examples of “sustainable” evil out there.
One might ask what this has to do with conservative living, but it’s quite simple. Animals that do not mesh well with the heavily industrial food production system can support a more distributed, robust food supply that is not controlled by a small number of centralized superproducers and their revolving-door government attaches.
What animals are CAFO-resistant? Ducks, geese, goats and sheep breeds optimized for grass/hay feeding (so, not dairy sheep). There are other CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation) resistant animals, but those are easy to find and the learning curve on raising them is not too hard for someone with no background in rural living (which is nearly all of us these days).
CAFO-resistance simply means that when you try to crowd the animal in conditions similar to what is done with chickens or pigs by the ten thousand, you lose production rather than maximize it. Goats can’t really be feedlotted, and many breeds of sheep are unsuited for it as well. Ducks and geese can fatten without purchased feeds at all and also don’t thrive with the small amount of space that permits chickens to reach market weight or lay eggs.
Now there is a trade-off. There always are, though. These animals were dropped for cattle and chickens precisely because they don’t take well to overcrowding and high inputs from the farmer. They need more space, but they produce well and are reasonably scalable to small and medium farm sizes. One thing there’s no shortage of in America, though, is land to raise hardy breeds of livestock on.
Taking a step away from the cow/chicken/pig triptych when supporting or attempting homesteading and small farming is an essential component of having a functional alternative to the current food system.